Since 2016 Rio Olympics and 2018 World Cup, FIH has discarded the classification matches and the final position will be decided based on the pool matches data.
Previously the World Ranking points were based on 4 years cycle and not by each match results - algorithm mode.
New Rankings tabulation was rolled out in Jan 2020 by FIH. To understand it, please read at
https://stickwithmike.blogspot.com/2020/07/new-fih-world-ranking-points-model.html?m=1
With this new roll out of rankings, then it makes more sense to have classification matches which will provides fair burden and equitability approach.
In coming 2024 Olympics there must be classification matches (9-12 & 5-8) for teams who are out of QF and SF slots due to rankings points based on algorithm & fair play in number of matches.
Look at quantity of Matches played or to be played by teams in ongoing Tokyo Olympics doesn't justify the fairness for teams who fail to pass the Knockout stages.
1. Teams out of QF played 5 matches
2. Teams out of SF played 6 matches
3. Teams that qualifies for SF/F/3&4 plays 8 matches.
Sometimes, you're lucky if you are placed in an easier pool. Like in Tokyo Olympics - Group A was easier than Group B. With classification matches, it will give you a true picture of where you finish in Olympics.
It's just my suggestion for betterment of competition format which carries fair play and allow teams to collect as much world ranking points and each team plays min of 7 matches as done previously in every Olympics before 2016 Rio Olympics.
Thanking you....
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment